StartUp

Replies to This Discussion

Reply to This

Sarah Palin

Reply to This

Here in the UK most people were astonished that Sarah Palin was picked as McCain's running mate and it quickly became evident that she wasn't - and never would be, up to the job as second in command or potentially commander in chief of America. Even if she was controlled by McCain's handlers, you would of thought some potential would have shone through, it didn't and the thought of her getting anywhere near those posts is scarey as hell, she is not a tenth of the woman Hillary Clinton is, in any department, what must the Republicans be thinking?
Are they a spent force - until they are led by someone intelligent, articulate and with loads of personality (a bit like Obama) they will fade into the wilderness, lets hope he/she appears soon, as all democracies need an effective opposition

Reply to This

Palin all the way!

Reply to This

I think it's kind of sad that these two would even be considered as Presidential candidates. Where did we go wrong as a nation just to assume that either of these two were qualified?

Personally, with Obama being elected, I look to move to Mexico until this country gets back on track. :)

Of course, if it was a beauty contest, Palin would win by a landslide...


Cohawk

Reply to This

I would definately say Hillary

Reply to This

Hillary, no contest! I shudder to think of Sarah Palin speaking to a President of another country with her "Gee" and "Joe six pack" language. They would think we are all idiots! Not that Hillary is perfect, but she can certainly hold her own and speak much more eloquently.

Reply to This

Sarah Palin. No contest! I don't see how any woman could vote for Hillary. No self-respecting woman would put up with a husband who cheated and humilated them publicly over and over again. I think the fact that she did so, was a terrible message to send to her daughter. And she is way too much of an elitist for me. Sarah Plain is far more down to earth and at least she has a sense of humor. I hope she takes the soon to be vacated senate seat for Alaska. She needs that experience in Washington to be a viable candidate in the future.

Reply to This

Both are pretty much done.

Reply to This

I know this reply is a little late, but I just got invited to this site today. Are you people kidding, no choice, Palin in 2012 or there may not be much of a free market place left. I know we have 4 yrs.of Mr. Obama to look forward to, and if we arn't completely socialized by 2012, then it is time to step up to the plate you patriots, and vote Palin. I fear for this country and the trend of big Government intervention, have we not lost enough jobs overseas, my God we're outsourcing our service work, and basically we are a service based nation. I don't here the machines grinding out Proudly Made In The U.S.A. much anymore! Reagan was RIGHT.

Reply to This

Right on !

Reply to This

Palin. Although I don't see this match up--

Reply to This

RSS

© 2009   StartUp | Report Spam and Scams |

Get Featured  |  Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!